Categories
Generative Art Reviews

Boredomresearch Review

My review of Boredomresearch’s show at TheSpace4 is now online at Furtherfield:

http://www.furtherfield.org/displayreview.php?From=Index&review_id=186

Categories
Reviews

Doctor Who: The Impossible Planet / The Satan Pit

Of a different key to previous series highpoint “The Girl In The Fireplace”, this two-parter took The Doctor and Rose to a planet orbiting a black hole (“The Impossible Planet”) and to the prison that something claiming to be the devil has been locked in since before the start of the universe (“The Satan Pit”). This was perfect science fiction TV. The murderous aliens, the possessed humans, the lost civilisations and a climax fought with synapses rather than sidearms, the tragedy of the loss of individuals against the backdrop of a threat to the entire universe.

This was dark and scary stuff for 7pm on BBC1, and more than that it was genuinely thought provoking. And dramatic, one of the kids said they thought The Doctor had died after – what do you mean you didn’t watch it? Go and watch it now!

Categories
Generative Art Reviews

New Art: Trading Sheep

New Art: Trading Sheep

Someone else gets the sheep! This is the best artwork I’ve seen this year. It moves the content of art on, expanding what and how you can show. You can look at it conceptually or relationally, but that its aesthetics is thought provoking (and in part provoked by thought) leads to the internal complexity of the artwork, not any tedious essays about it. This goes to the audience, and it takes the audience new places.

Categories
Reviews

Who, hah! Hah, hah, hah Who, hah!

Ooh yes. A cliffhanger.

Excellent stuff. Was it really only 45 minutes? I just wish they’d drop the soap plots, the crap music and the kiddie TV lighting. And another thi – ahhhhhh! everyone is about to be turned into Cybermen! Ohshitohshitohshit!

Categories
Aesthetics Generative Art Reviews Satire

I, for one, welcome our new net.prick overlords. [Via Rhizome RAW]

There’s a case to be made that the volume and duration of postings [by a net.art mailer script that accidentally flooded the Rhizome RAW mailing list with spam] makes the work sculpture. That their transgression makes them interrogative of unexamined social norms, which gives them critical content and value. And that this has shocked the bourgeoisie, which you don’t get too often these days, making it radical.

To attempt to make that case would be academic narcissism hankering after the decontextualised frisson of an unreflectively transgressive “real”. Or would it?

This is the problem with neoconceptualism: would it be if it wasn’t? Or rather, is it or isn’t it? There’s assisted readymades and then there’s making something to nominate. The latter is more than a little suspect, a bit like taking a felt pen to a laboratory mouse. If a spam flood attack wouldn’t ordinarily be art, which magical aura of art makes this spam flood attack “art”? If this en-arted (created, nominated) spam flood attack is art, can I nominate any real (authentic!) spam flood attack as (better!) art? Particularly one I might (or might not) unleash on the artist as an appropriation of their ouvre to index its (presumably) vitally important content. Surely the Sistine Chapel Ceiling of this particular genre would be a DDoS on the server hosting the project (chosen randomly from a list of one).

Yeah, this (RAW) is the audience to expect to chin-stroke to the bone over a (simulated?) flood attack. If we can ever be bothered to work out whether the skript is functioning as intended or this is just technical as well as conceptual incompetence. Where can we get the source?

The Tate buying a monoprint by someone who simply cannot draw is not the same as Rhizome Raw being graced by the genius of a would-be skript kiddie (please not “hacker”, we’ll be at “hacktivism” next and then I will have to stab someone to death with their conference name badge). And I say this as someone who can bang out a decent nude as well as a decent killfile entry.

I, for one, welcome our new net.prick overlords.

Categories
Reviews Satire

Geoffrey Chaucer Hath a Blog

Geoffrey Chaucer Hath a Blog

And moft fyne it is. Feer Chaucer’s 1337 middel English skylls!

Categories
Aesthetics Reviews

Chris Ashley Review

The review of Chris Ashley’s HTML drawings that I wrote for Furtherfield is now live:

Look, See. (2006) – Chris Ashley

And Chris has posted a review of my review:

Essay at Furtherfield by Rob Myers

Read both and hopefully get an insight into some excellent art.

Categories
Reviews

Teri Sue Wood’s WANDERING STAR!

Teri Sue Wood’s WANDERING STAR!

Wonderful comic from a wonderful artist, now being presented online.

Take a look.

Categories
Aesthetics Generative Art Reviews

Benjamin Edwards : Works, Projects, Archive

Benjamin Edwards : Works, Projects, Archive

Wow, wow wow!

This is brilliant!

Excellent post-digital art with an architectural and iconographic emphasis, with lots of public domain illustrations as source material.

Take a look!

Via Happy Famous Artists.

Categories
Reviews

Mind Performance Hacks

Mind Performance Hacks

De Bono, Buzan, 43 Folders, Bowie & Eno, the Oulipo, and more in an O’Reilly book. It’s qute mind blowing, a wonderful collection of creative ideas and influences, all with suggestions for further reading, and will save you months of research and search. It will also allow you to nod sagely when your friends mention Oblique Strategies, The Oulipo, their Hipster PDA, or an exoself.
The author even provides Perl scripts for some of this stuff. 🙂

Extremely recommended.