Science shouldn’t use copyright to silence Creationists


This is exactly the sort of thing we’ve been talking about on fc-uk-discuss at the moment. Copyright being used to prevent criticism that you don’t agree with. Or to prevent misrepresentation. Or to prevent downright lies by fanatical idiots:


Cory says Science shouldn’t use copyright to silence Creationists



But what about using copyright to stop personal claims, or misrepresentation of personal opinion? Is there a line beyond which not using copyright to stop others ascribing opinions to people that they don’t actually hold becomes morally unacceptable? And can it be described quantitively?


Technorati Tags:


Posted in Free Culture

Archives

Categories

License

Creative Commons License http://robmyers.org is licensed by Rob Myers under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 License.